By Rob Selleck
RE/MAX Times Associate Editor
How many potential violations of the U.S. Fair Housing Act can you spot in this advertisement?
Two bedroom executive home in exclusive neighborhood. Walking distance to country club. Active adult living at its finest. Perfect environment for empty nesters looking for quiet, private neighborhood.
If you missed any of the eight potential pitfalls, you're exposing yourself and your office to some costly penalties - or at least to some legal hassles that can easily be avoided.
Why take the risk?
The National Association of Realtors and groups such as the Oregon Newspaper Publishers Association have created comprehensive publications that guide real estate agents and brokerages through the requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Law in general - and its advertising impacts in particular.
The act prohibits housing discrimination based on race, color, sex, handicap, familial status and national origin. Some state and local provi sions cover marital status and other classifications as well.
The manual produced by the Oregon Newspapers group states, "Charges of discrimination are more likely now, whether or not they will be proven ultimately before a judge . ... There are `fair housing councils' active in many localities that are pursuing creators and publishers of alleged illegal advertising. It is to everyone's benefit, especially to the benefit of the advertisers and readers of newspapers and the consumers of residential housing, if we are scrupulous about learning the provisions of the law."
The Oregon newspapers group created the manual in response to a battery of Fair Housing violation charges levied against 13 Oregon newspapers in late 1991 by the Fair Housing Council of Oregon.
The fact that newspapers are included in the liability loop doesn't mean real estate agents and brokerages placing advertisements are excluded. Indeed, real estate agents are under even closer scrutiny. Additionally, as the Oregon manual notes, the discrimination doesn't have to be intentional. Ignorance of the law's particulars is no excuse.
And while fairness and common sense go far in assuring compliance with the Act, it takes closer study to truly understand the laws' scope and consequences as the example ad at the opening of this article demonstrates.
The most effective general guideline emphasized by both NAR and the Oregon Newspapers group is succinctly stated in the Oregon manual: "The English language is rich and so are writers' imaginations. We can write enticingly and persuasively about the property. Just avoid referring to the kinds of people who might live in a particular dwelling, because that is where discrimination sneaks in."
In other words, mention number of bedrooms not number of people; in a rental ad specify "no drinking" and "no smoking," not non-drinkers and non-smokers. Even a phrase as seemingly innocuous as "handyman's dream" should raise a caution flag. In the wrong context it could be construed as indicating preference for a single male. The solution? Stick to "fixer-upper."
Emphasize amenities, not potential participants: tennis courts, not tennis players; paths, not bicyclists.
Emphasizing a property's proximity to certain landmarks also creates some potential problems. A home billed as near a "church," or "synagogue," or "temple," could be interpreted as an attempt to steer a certain religious group to or away from the area. Even some neighborhood names in certain cities have taken on a type of code status that suggests poverty, affluence, ethnic background or national origin.
The Oregon manual suggests sticking with geographical-type locations such as northwest, southeast, or street names.